Contracts
US services agreements: what you cannot leave out
By Thiago Vieira — Lawyer admitted in Brazil (OAB) and Portugal (OA), founder of Pactum Global
September 18, 2026 · Reviewed on October 12, 2026 · 6 min read
Anyone selling services to US clients learns early that a contract is not there to win lawsuits: it is there to prevent arguments. Most vendor-client disputes come from three simple gaps — a vague scope, an ambiguous payment term, and no termination rule.
Scope is the heart of the document. Describe concrete deliverables instead of generic promises. "Marketing consulting" is not scope; "four monthly performance reports and two review calls" is. Anything excluded should be written as excluded.
On payment, define currency, term in days, payment method, who absorbs bank fees and what happens on late payment. A modest late-payment interest plus a suspension-of-services clause resolves most delays before they become collections.
Then come the protections: confidentiality, IP ownership of deliverables, limitation of liability, governing law and venue. This is where most free templates fail — they mix clauses from different jurisdictions and contradict themselves.
In Pactum, every answer in the questionnaire changes the final contract text. Instead of filling in blanks, you assemble a coherent document, drafted in English, in minutes.
In short
- — Scope by deliverables, never by adjectives
- — Term, currency and late-payment consequence always explicit
- — Governing law and venue consistent with the state of incorporation
Generate this document in Pactum instead of writing it.
Answer simple questions and get the full, consistent text, drafted in English.
Create account